Case Auditing for Personal Injury Claims
ImpairmentPros™
Performing Objective Testing and Impairment Ratings Of The Injured
About Dr. Michael Thompson
- Licensed Doctor of Chiropractic since 1988
- 35 Years in Personal Injury
- Workers’ Compensation Designated Doctor for TDI
- Certified in the performance of impairment ratings since 1993
- Certified Craniocervical expert with Society of Orthospinology
- Cone Beam CT 3D Technology
We accept:
- PIP
- Med-pay
- Liens/Letter of Protection
Why ImpairmentPros?
- Validate the existence of injuries using the latest technology and methods in accordance to the AMA Guides
- Document functional loss and subsequent improvement
- Refute bogus peer reviews and insurance company examinations
- Accurate impairment ratings for accident victims once they reach Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI)
- Perform valid independent examinations of injured individuals
- Provide expert witness testimony on injury cases when necessary
Did You Know?
Insurance company peer review doctors are hired to protect the interests of the insurance company. Insurance peer reviewers look for three primary things – duration of care, type of treatment and frequency of visits.
Here is a list of what peer reviewers look for:
- Did the treating doctor over code or under document the initial exam?
- Was the treatment medically necessary?
- Was the treatment indicated according to the diagnosis?
- Was treatment effectiveness documented utilizing objective outcome measures?
- Is treatment duration appropriate?
- Is the final impairment rating accurate?
The Effect of Impairment Ratings on Injury Cases
Most insurance companies use software such as Colossus, XM, TEACH to help determine the settlement value of their personal injury cases. In each of these programs, an impairment is the largest value driver, second only to the diagnosis. An adjuster will not enter an impairment rating if it is not in the medical records and demand letter. The impairment will be disregarded if it done incorrectly.
X-Ray Digitizing
Ligament laxity is evident in about 35% to 45% of all whiplash cases. There are two (2) types of ligament laxity, angulation and translation.
X-Ray Digitizing objectively demonstrates ligament laxity of the spine using the standards determined by White and Panjabi and the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th Edition.
X-Ray Digitizing is necessary to determine the presence of ligament laxity.
Refer your patients to ImpairmentPros for X-Ray Digitizing so that your patient’s functional performance can be objectively documented throughout care.
All studies are performed by a doctor who is an expert is analyzing and explaining the findings of these studies.